
Would you like to know more?
Moderator: Moderators
I'm fairly certain that the front forks do in fact have a positive rake, therefore ensuring dynamic stability. It would be awful damn silly of Confederate to make a bike that costs 110 large that, um, doesn't ride.zaxrex wrote:Me not an motocicle engenear, but it looks to me that the front fork is curved inward and that the contact patch of the tire is behind the axis of turn line (positive scrub radius). Isn't that like dynamically unstable? Or are bikes magically different in steering than cars? (Plea to RJ from CA on this one)
zaxrex wrote:Me not an motocicle engenear, but it looks to me that the front fork is curved inward and that the contact patch of the tire is behind the axis of turn line (positive scrub radius). Isn't that like dynamically unstable? Or are bikes magically different in steering than cars? (Plea to RJ from CA on this one)
Yeah. See also,snaab wrote: You're totally right Zack, about the "rake". Rake is motorcycle speak for castor. Colin's also right, in that it's probably just a mild optical illusion caused by the slope of the fork. The rake is determined by the relation of the bottom of the fork with the top of the fork, and it definitely appears in order, besides the bowed shape.
Looks a lot like the seat on some of the new harleys and a lot of the new "chopper" bikes. With bars that far up and that far forward, you don't need a whole lot holding your tush on the seat, and it does cant up and forwards a bit. I would imagine it has as much support as is necessary.But please, did no one else notice that horrid seating surface?! It's like they're trying to make it uncomfortable. I also just noticed how meager the thing looks from head one
The Fighter clarifies opaqueness and nullifies hype with straight-forward true to concept certitude. At the source is a classic right triangle. Proportion is classically derived. Scale is middle way. Bearing exudes structural permanence. Human integration deploys yang energy, vitality and power in the most simple, pure and direct form.
Sabre wrote:Yep, the rake is fine
avriette wrote:Sabre wrote:Yep, the rake is fine![]()
BUT OMG DID YOU SEE THE SEAT IN THAT PICTURE? I previously defended that seat as having enough support for your ass, but holy shit, that bike should be called the ballcrusher. And I thought I had "tank-giblets" clearance problems!!
A hugeavriette wrote:Yeah. See also,snaab wrote: You're totally right Zack, about the "rake". Rake is motorcycle speak for castor. Colin's also right, in that it's probably just a mild optical illusion caused by the slope of the fork. The rake is determined by the relation of the bottom of the fork with the top of the fork, and it definitely appears in order, besides the bowed shape.
I'm glad someone else brought up that picture. I'd been looking for a good one to host for a little. That particular b0nk is way different. up front is essentially a reversed swingarm. Crazy different suspension design. There was a french guy who basically designed that bike in Photoshop without any blueprints. Some of the better bike builders got together and actually made the damn thing based on a bunch of pictures. ALL the mechanical parts, suspension design, etc were ALL done by the builder and they were ALL one-offs. Absolutely crazy stuff. It's like doodling a picture of a condo building and telling your GC "Get to building man, I want this!"
Owwie. Do not want.But please, did no one else notice that horrid seating surface?! It's like they're trying to make it uncomfortable. I also just noticed how meager the thing looks from head one
Looks a lot like the seat on some of the new harleys and a lot of the new "chopper" bikes. With bars that far up and that far forward, you don't need a whole lot holding your tush on the seat, and it does cant up and forwards a bit. I would imagine it has as much support as is necessary.
That having been said, it looks like it wouldn't lean real well, but it might be fun to drive down to park it next to that 502 boss hoss that's always in downtown alexandria on weekends. And while that powerplant smacks of Buell, i betcha it's loud and flatulent and is good for big burnouts in traffic. If not quite wheelies.
I have to wonder about the weight distribution front to rear... I bet it's pretty easy to make that rear step right out.
And, I'm kinda with Colin. I think somebody took the "fighter" concept and just said "let's just take that singular style element and make it a ... that's it, a theme!". Cept they forgot the part about weight and "lean" (as in muscle, not as in angle) looks. Totally not refusing a ride on it.
To me, it's like any other concept vehicle. Wouldn't want to own it, but it looks radical and I'd love to take it for a spin. Or a burnout. Or two.
edit: also, for my $110k, I'm going to have me a desmosedici, a new fireblade, and a new set of satin black sharkskins on the big kawi. and enough money left over to buy colin that cruiser he wants so he can keep his fapmachine
Dude, it's contagious. You notice the DC1WD forum sprang up because the colin-two-wheels-syndrome is so contagious?snaab wrote:Colin could practically write this thread himself. That is to say, we can leave him alone to discuss bikes by himself
avriette wrote:
Dude, it's contagious.