while i haven't had the opportunity to play with zfs yet, i've been meaning to.
anyway, this is hella pimp if they keep it to spec.
http://tech.zamwi.com/2007/01/16/why-do ... t-for-zfs/
osx + zfs
Moderator: Moderators
-
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:00 pm
- Location: washington, dc
- Contact:
- complacent
- DCAWD Founding Member
- Posts: 11651
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: near the rockies. very.
- Contact:
- Sabre
- DCAWD Founding Member
- Posts: 21432
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Springfield, VA
- Contact:
Nope, haven't had a chance to play with it, although I've kept it in the back of my head for one of those rainy afternoons
Reminds me a little of BFS (one more article here as well).

Sabre (Julian)

92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.

92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
- Libra Monkee
- Moderator
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:04 pm
- Location: The Ether
- Contact:
-
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:48 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
- Contact:
-
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:48 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
- Contact:
Re: osx + zfs
In other news, I read about sshfs for OSX today:schvin wrote:while i haven't had the opportunity to play with zfs yet, i've been meaning to.
anyway, this is hella pimp if they keep it to spec.
http://tech.zamwi.com/2007/01/16/why-do ... t-for-zfs/
http://mac.pqrs.org/sshfs/
turns out it runs in userland. This is pretty useful stuff. Kind of interesting how these postmodern filesystems are evolving (such as the gmailfs of a couple years ago).
rocket scientist