Net Neutrality

The place for technology related posts.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Lots of news... all of it very bad...

Republicans Create Rider To Stop Net Neutrality:
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Tex.) submitted a rider yesterday to a bill on military and veterans' construction projects. The rider would, 'prohibit the FCC from using any appropriated funds to adopt, implement or otherwise litigate any network neutrality based rules, protocols or standards.' It is co-signed by six other Republican senators. We all knew this was coming after the last election removed most of the vocal supporters of net neutrality and supplanted them with pro-corporate Republicans.
Look Forward To Per-Service, Per-Page Fees:
"[Two] companies, Allot Communications and Openet — suppliers to large wireless companies including AT&T and Verizon — showed off a new product in a web seminar Tuesday, which included aPowerPoint presentation (1.5-MB .pdf) that was sent to Wired by a trusted source. The idea? Make it possible for your wireless provider to monitor everything you do online and charge you extra for using Facebook, Skype or Netflix. For instance, in the seventh slide of the above PowerPoint, a Vodafone user would be charged two cents per MB for using Facebook, three euros a month to use Skype and $0.50 monthly for a speed-limited version of YouTube."

Obama FCC Caves on Net Neutrality -- Tuesday Betrayal Assured
Late Monday, a majority of the FCC's commissioners indicated that they're going to vote with Chairman Julius Genachowski for a toothless Net Neutrality rule.

According to all reports, the rule, which will be voted on during tomorrow's FCC meeting, falls drastically short of earlier pledges by President Obama and the FCC Chairman to protect the free and open Internet.

The rule is so riddled with loopholes that it's become clear that this FCC chairman crafted it with the sole purpose of winning the endorsement of AT&T and cable lobbyists, and not defending the interests of the tens of millions of Internet users.

Welcome to AT&T's Internet

For the first time in history of telecommunications law the FCC has given its stamp of approval to online discrimination.

Instead of a rule to protect Internet users' freedom to choose, the Commission has opened the door for broadband payola - letting phone and cable companies charge steep tolls to favor the content and services of a select group of corporate partners, relegating everyone else to the cyber-equivalent of a winding dirt road.

Instead of protecting openness on wireless Internet devices like the iPhone and Droid, the Commission has exempted the mobile Internet from Net Neutrality protections. This move enshrines Verizon and AT&T as gatekeepers to the expanding world of mobile Internet access, allowing them to favor their own applications while blocking, degrading or de-prioritizing others.

Instead of re-establishing the FCC's authority to act as a consumer watchdog over the Internet, it places the agency's authority on a shaky and indefensible legal footing -- giving ultimate control over the Internet to a small handful of carriers.

Obama's 'Mission Accomplished'

Internet users deserve far better, and we thought we were going to get it from a president who promised to "take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality." Watch now as he and his FCC chairman try to spin tomorrow's betrayal as another "mission accomplished."

Don't believe it. This bogus victory has become all too familiar to those watching the Obama administration and its appointees squander opportunities for real change. The reality is that reform is just a rhetorical front for industry compromises that reward the biggest players and K-Street lobbyists while giving the public nothing.

It's not the FCC chairman's job to seek consensus among the corporations that he was put into office to regulate. His duty is to protect Internet users.

More than two million people have taken action on behalf of Net Neutrality. Tomorrow, we'll all get the carpet yanked from beneath our feet.

Net Neutrality is the freedom of speech, freedom of choice issue of the 21st century. It's the guarantee of a more open and democratic media system that was baked into the Internet at its founding.

On Tuesday, Obama's FCC is going to sell that out.
Fucked up beyond all reasonable doubt.
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

Sabre wrote::evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Lots of news... all of it very bad...

Fucked up beyond all reasonable doubt.
agreed. 100%

I don't care what your political affiliations are, Al Franken is 100% right-on in regards to net neutrality.
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
drwrx
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 4382
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 8:00 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by drwrx »

I am ABSOLUTELY 100% in agreement with you (and Al) on this!
You can expect the network carriers (AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, etc.) to just start milking this, and us, to death!
There will now be a new line item appearing on every bill you receive (network access fee). Sure, it would only be a modest fee, say $6-10 a month, depending on the "level" of service you are receiving. What it will mean is an unprecendented level of control as well as an unprecedented level of income for them, entirely at our expense.

Who ever said consolidation was a good thing?
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

this was an actual proposal given last tuesday.

it makes me very sad and angry to see.
Just a week before the FCC holds a vote on whether to apply fairness rules to some of the nation’s internet service providers, two companies that sell their services to the country’s largest cellular companies showed off a different vision of the future: one where you’ll have to pay extra to watch YouTube or use Facebook.

The companies, Allot Communications and Openet — suppliers to large wireless companies including AT&T and Verizon — showed off a new product in a web seminar Tuesday, which included a PowerPoint presentation (1.5-MB .pdf) that was sent to Wired by a trusted source.

The idea? Make it possible for your wireless provider to monitor everything you do online and charge you extra for using Facebook, Skype or Netflix. For instance, in the seventh slide of the above PowerPoint, a Vodafone user would be charged two cents per MB for using Facebook, three euros a month to use Skype and $0.50 monthly for a speed-limited version of YouTube. But traffic to Vodafone’s services would be free, allowing the mobile carrier to create video services that could undercut NetFlix on price.
:censor: this noise in the :censor: with a double-headed :censor: :censor: :censor: licking :censor: :censor:
i pledge allegiance to the corporations of america.... one nation, under surveillance...
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Mr Kleen
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 15034
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Wiesbaden.DE

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Mr Kleen »

Max Headroom is the future.
User avatar
PGT
DCAWD Groupie
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:06 am
Location: Loudoun

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by PGT »

2013 BMW 328i M Sport with 8sp in Estoril Blue II
2012 Chrysler 300C SRT8 - Always bet on black
2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Edition, otherwise known as the MW3 (and badass)
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

The future:
37243.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

:plusone: :cry:
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
schvin
DCAWD Groupie
Posts: 1659
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:00 pm
Location: washington, dc
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by schvin »

Mr Kleen wrote:Max Headroom is the future.
+1
2004 impreza outback
1964 beetle
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

New poll: 1 in 5 of Americans want 'Net regulated like TV.
"American voters believe free market competition will protect Internet users more than government regulation and fear that regulation will be used to push a political agenda," proclaims the Rasmussen Reports group, following a telephone survey of 1,000 "likely voters."

...

But what was most disturbing about the poll was that 21 percent of respondents to question number two actually said yes, they would like the FCC to regulate the 'Net like it does radio and TV—an option that many net neutrality supporters would likely decline, especially when it comes to indecency rules
:roll: :evil: :evil:
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

there are far too many people who are too stupid to realize what they're saying on this matter.

very, very frustrating.
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Raven
Mr. Underpowered or something
Posts: 1221
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:46 pm
Location: Manasty

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Raven »

This is why I don't care...cause there's not a god damn thing I can do about it. :roll:
All my cars have drum brakes and are sub 200 hp, what am I doing with my life?
2013 Mazda 2
1994 Chevy S10 pickup
1985 Chevy Caprice (no fuel system)
User avatar
zaxrex
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 6350
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: asiandale

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by zaxrex »

Patience is the ability to idle your motor when you feel like stripping your gears
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

Oh freaking hell. I had the tab open, which I thought was because I meant to post it... turns out it was because I was supposed to read it. haha
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

recent ars technica article.
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) wrote:Just four days before Christmas, the FCC will make its vampric leap from its traditional jurisdiction—the terrestrial radio and land line telephones that have fallen into disuse; onto the gifts piled neatly under our trees. The iPads and iPhones, Androids, Wiis, Webbooks, and WiFi will all feel the federal bite in a way they never have before…

The FCC is effectively nationalizing the web… Industry and creative content providers who were coerced into this deal by an over zealous FCC Chairman should take heart. Like the breaking of dawn, the new Congress will prove a swift antidote to the federal bloodsucker you found at your throat this Christmas.
Okay. What planet is this :censor: on?!?

She needs to get the telco industry's :censor: out of her :censor: and actually listen for a bit.

In every way that Al Franken is 100% spot-on regarding net neutrality, this woman is 100% spot-off.

Tennessee, I am dissapoint. :notcool:
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Raven
Mr. Underpowered or something
Posts: 1221
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:46 pm
Location: Manasty

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Raven »

I find the Republicans' loathing of big government rather amusing consider that they are a part of it.
All my cars have drum brakes and are sub 200 hp, what am I doing with my life?
2013 Mazda 2
1994 Chevy S10 pickup
1985 Chevy Caprice (no fuel system)
User avatar
Mr Kleen
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 15034
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Wiesbaden.DE

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Mr Kleen »

Raven wrote:I find the Republicans' lip service about loathing of big government rather amusing consider that they are a part of it.
they want the regulating portions of government smaller so that the big businesses they work for have fewer hindrances. and they're all hawkish only because they own stock in the MIC. meet the new boss... :jerkit:
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

al franken has an open letter on his website regarding the big comcast/nbc merger.

please check it out.
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

National Journal article
House Passes Amendment to Block Funds for Net Neutrality Order:
The House passed an amendment Thursday that would bar the Federal Communications Commission from using any funding to implement the network-neutrality order it approved in December.
The amendment, approved on a 244-181 vote, was offered by Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., to legislation that would fund government agencies for the rest of fiscal year 2011.
Walden and other critics of the FCC's net-neutrality order argue it will stifle innovation and investment in broadband. The order aims to bar broadband providers from discriminating against Internet content, services, or applications.
"If left unchallenged, this claim of authority would allow the FCC to regulate any matter it discussed in the national broadband plan," Walden said.
Mother fuckers...
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

what a bunch of money-grubbing dickheads.
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by complacent »

i pledge allegiance, to the united corporations of america...
:(
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Sabre »

Dutch pass net neut law
The Dutch have passed a law prohibiting internet providers from slowing down traffic unless it's to ease congestion, preserve security or block spam.

The Netherlands thus becomes the first European country to legislate a rulebook for what network operators can or can't do - and only the second country in the world to do so.

The law also bans advertisers from dropping cookies on PCs without the user's consent.

Operators will also be forbidden from charging based on access to services and applications, outlawing offerings such as an old-skool shell account, or low latency ISP for gamers.

It's all expected to hit mobile operators hard: Vodafone permits Skype but charges a fee to use it on smartphones, while T-Mobile blocks Skype and VoIP apps.
<sarcasm> I freaking love it! </sarcasm> The damn country which invented the Internet and claims all these "freedoms" isn't the first or second to pass a law that should have come out years ago. :evil: (In case you were wondering, the Netherlands was the first)
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
Post Reply