Linux KVM vs. VirtualBox 4.0 Virtualization Benchmarks

The place for technology related posts.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Linux KVM vs. VirtualBox 4.0 Virtualization Benchmarks

Post by Sabre »

Phoronix article
Oracle's been vigorously working on their VM VirtualBox 4.0 software and in just the past week they have delivered two public betas that bring a number of new features. Among the changes there is support for Intel HD audio / ICH9 to guest VMs, the concept of extension packs, user-interface improvements, support for limiting a virtual machine's CPU time and I/O bandwidth, 3D acceleration fixes for guests, and a great number of bug-fixes. How though is this updated Oracle/Sun virtualization platform comparing to the older VirtualBox 3.2 release and that of the upstream Linux KVM (the Kernel-based Virtual Machine) that most Linux distributions rely upon? Here are a number of benchmarks that seek to answer this very question.

...

In a majority of the benchmarks used that were mostly CPU oriented, the Kernel-based Virtual Machine was measurably faster than VirtualBox 3.2.12 and VirtualBox 4.0 Beta 2. The only area where VirtualBox decisively pulled in front of KVM was with the disk benchmarks, but it's a situation where VirtualBox by default isn't obeying sync/fsync requests made within the guest, so it's numbers are shown as even being faster than the host operating system, but it comes with potential data integrity issues.

While VirtualBox may be slower than KVM in many areas, VirtualBox does provide 2D and 3D acceleration support to guests, among other features, not currently offered by KVM/QEMU.

As far as the VirtualBox 4 performance goes, in many areas right now its performance with the just-released Oracle VM VirtualBox 4.0 Beta 2 is slower than VirtualBox 3.2.12. However, it is a beta release not intended for use in a production capacity and we will be back with more VirtualBox 4.0 benchmarks upon the program's final release to see whether these regressions are still present or how the performance shakes down.
I thought it was interesting that some benchmarks improved with virtualizing!
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Linux KVM vs. VirtualBox 4.0 Virtualization Benchmarks

Post by complacent »

i hate the fact that vb is now an oracle product.

guess there isn't a whole lot of choice right now.
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Raven
Mr. Underpowered or something
Posts: 1221
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:46 pm
Location: Manasty

Re: Linux KVM vs. VirtualBox 4.0 Virtualization Benchmarks

Post by Raven »

I do love me some virtualization and Virtualbox is my tool of choice for playing (mostly cause I use Windows as my base OS).
All my cars have drum brakes and are sub 200 hp, what am I doing with my life?
2013 Mazda 2
1994 Chevy S10 pickup
1985 Chevy Caprice (no fuel system)
Post Reply