Mr Kleen wrote:encrypt all data and send it to the cloud, then wipe the laptop from orbit.
it's the only way to be sure...
the second your data hits the cloud, your
legal expectations to privacy and anonymity go out the window.
basically given the current rules, the only way to keep your data safe is to leave it in your home, period.
your "home" can't even be a car or a mobile home... i've been doing a bunch of reading on this. it's a very ugly catch-22.
*begin rant*
for a reeeely long time in this country, search and seizure have been allowed/used at
all border entry points. since planes now go anywhere and land anywhere, airports are considered border entry points.
this has always
included us citizens. i believe it is fair that as a sovereign country, we should be allowed to monitor what is brought into and taken out of our borders. this is a resonable concept that is adopted the world over. there is no avoiding this.
the
only thing open to debate (IMHO) is what constitutes one's private thoughts. a safe, for example, does not. a briefcase does not. basing their decision on the previous two statements, computers don't count either. as more and more of an individual's life is created/maintained on computers (bank statements, health records, etc) folks like the EFF are arguing the concept that a person can no longer contain/maintain all of their "private information and thoughts"
without the aid of a computer.
If they succeed, there will be some form of a leg to stand on concerning computers and privacy. Currently, the courts
do not see it this way. Things are even worse in places like England.
This is an issue that needs to have very clear definitions because it will impact all of us for years to come. Imagine a Johny Mnemonic-style senario: Is the data (in his head) subject to search (it is a hard drive), or is it considered private thought? A bit off, but needs to be planned for.
It's big. It's ugly. We should all pay
real close attention.
*end rant*