Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

The place for technology related posts.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Sabre
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 21432
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Springfield, VA
Contact:

Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by Sabre »

Full Article
Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.
They're not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.

The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

...

When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. "We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs--from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records," Rockefeller said.

The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government's role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama acknowledged that the government is "not as prepared" as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.
Rockefeller's revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a "cybersecurity workforce plan" from every federal agency, a "dashboard" pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a "comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy" in six months--even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.

The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "As soon as you're saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it's going to be a really big issue," he says.

Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)

"The language has changed but it doesn't contain any real additional limits," EFF's Tien says. "It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)...The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There's no provision for any administrative process or review. That's where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it."
:notcool:
Sabre (Julian)
Image
92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by complacent »

I guarantee this is going to be a ginormous debate for some time.

I will be supremely disappointed if this simply flies right through.

This is something that needs an extraordinary amount of debate, due process and oversight.



Ninja edit by Sabre: flights -> flies
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
chicken n waffles
Moderator
Posts: 6314
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:15 am
Location: Alexandria

Re: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by chicken n waffles »

i guarantee that if this passes, every hacker worth a lick of salt in the world will come together to destroy the government.










can't wait! :nana:
-Ben
Image
User avatar
Mr Kleen
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 15034
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: Wiesbaden.DE

Re: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by Mr Kleen »

sorry but I couldn't help but chuckle at the phrase "bill would give president emergency control of Internet."
User avatar
complacent
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 11651
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: near the rockies. very.
Contact:

Re: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by complacent »

Update/counter article found here.

Some very good points are raised. Perhaps it's not as big an outrage as initially thought?
colin

a tank, a yammie, a spaceship
i <3 teh 00ntz
User avatar
Libra Monkee
Moderator
Posts: 6478
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: The Ether
Contact:

Re: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by Libra Monkee »

chicken n waffles wrote:i guarantee that if this passes, every hacker worth a lick of salt in the world will come together to destroy the government.










can't wait! :nana:
:plusone:
Image

Libra Monkee- "Helping DCAWD meet its Equal Opportunity requirement since 2006."
User avatar
ElZorro
DCAWD Founding Member
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: USA! USA!

Re: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Post by ElZorro »

WELL, WHEN TEH GUBMENT IZ COMPLETELY DEPENDENT ON SOOOOOO MUTCH COTS HARDWARE, SISTEMS AN SERVICEZ, HOW ELSE CAN IT KEEP SERVICEZ UP? LETS SAY SOMEONE ATTACKZ VERIZONS NETWORK 2 SHUT DOWN GOVT BBY SERVICE. OR BOTNET STARTS 2 SATURATE WAN OV TEH MAJOR LONG-HAUL CARRIERS. THAR R TIEMS WHEN TEH GUBMENT NEEDZ 2 COUNT ON COMMERSHUL SERVICEZ, AN AS SUCH CUD NED 2 STEP IN. IMAGINE IF SOMEONE ATTACKD AN OIL REFINERY (PRIVATELY OWND BUT PROVIDEZ FUEL 2 GOVT), U KNOE TEH NASHUNAL GUARD, AT LEAST, WUD BE THAR 2 PROTECT IT. OR SOMEONE STARTD BLOWIN UP TRAIN TRACKZ (PRIVATELY OWND BUT MOVEZ GOODZ TEH GOVT USEZ).
Jason "El Zorro" Fox
'17 Subaru Forester 2.0XT
DCAWD - old coots in fast scoots.
Post Reply