Page 1 of 1

iTunes Movie Rental Review

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:12 am
by WRXWagon2112
Overall, not bad. 8 out of 10. I agree with the reviewer about the restrictions, but I can understand why Apple/Steve Jobs had to allow them. Now if he can convince the studios to bend the pricing and restrictions ...

Link-a-roo
Pricing
Let's start with pricing since everybody is probably wondering if it's cheaper or worth bothering. Here's how Apple is breaking down the costs of renting movies from iTunes:
  • Library Title - $2.99
    New Release - $3.99
    HD Rentals - $4.99 (apparently only for Apple TV initially later this month, not sure if this will be available for computers as well later)
All in all the pricing isn't too bad at all; it seems about on par with cable TV's "on demand" products. However, there are a couple of things I don't like. The definition of "Library Title" seems too broad to me and I think there should be a "Classic" sub-category for movies that are older than 30 years—and the price should be around $0.99. That would encourage a lot more rentals since it's a bit ridiculous to expect people to pay three bucks for an ancient movie from the 1950s or whatever.
Actually renting the movie is as simple as clicking the Rent Movie button, confirming your choice and then waiting for your download to begin (assuming you are already signed into the iTunes store, if not you will have to sign in). I was able to start watching the movie shortly after the download began and had no problems. My download continued while I was viewing the movie.
Restrictions

One thing that I did not like was that you have 24 hours to finish watching the movie after you play the movie. You have up to 30 days to begin viewing, but once you start watching it, your 24 hour timer begins counting down. That stupid restriction had to come from the idiot movie studios whose heads are still firmly up their collective rear ends when it comes to customer satisfaction.

For me, 24 hours is not that big of a deal. But for people with kids and other distractions, it can sometimes be impossible to finish a movie in 24 hours. Also, since one of the virtues of iTunes movie rentals is that you can easily move your movies to your iPhone or iPod, it would seem to be a potential issue for travelers who might want to watch the movie in small bites over the course of a few days.

I'm not really sure what the heck the movie studios were thinking here. Did they think that if people rented movies and kept them for 72 hours or longer that this would cost the movie studios money? How? By people calling their friends to come over and watch it? Talk about paranoid! It seems the movie studios have been hanging around the morons from the RIAA or something.
--Alan

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:21 am
by Sabre
I'm glad to hear that the service is working as it should, but I have to agree that the 24 hour period is just ridiculous. What's the big deal with allowing people to watch it over a couple of days? There is no logic behind it that I can see.

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:24 am
by complacent
I agree, the 24 hour thing is strange. Would be nice to watch it a few times over two or three days if you really liked the movie.

*shrugs*

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:23 am
by chicken n waffles
pass. i'll steal my movies the old fashioned way.

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:30 am
by Libra Monkee
chicken n waffles wrote:pass. i'll steal my movies the old fashioned way.
QFT :D

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:45 am
by WRXWagon2112
chicken n waffles wrote:pass. i'll steal my movies the old fashioned way.
You'll buy a cheap DVD on the street corner and watch a bad camcorder recording of it? With people talking and walking in and out of the picture? 8)

--Alan