Page 1 of 2
holy crizzap
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:14 am
by WANGAN_X
I may be getting back into the AWD side afterall, i found a helluva deal on a 06 STi that i honestly can't pass up... more to come
Re: holy crizzap
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:22 am
by sirwilliam
WANGAN_X wrote:I may be getting back into the AWD side afterall, i found a helluva deal on a 06 STi that i honestly can't pass up... more to come
You sure you don't want to hold out until '08

Re: holy crizzap
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:37 pm
by Sabre
WANGAN_X wrote:I may be getting back into the AWD side afterall, i found a helluva deal on a 06 STi that i honestly can't pass up... more to come
w00t! Glad to hear it, not that I didn't love the goat

Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:46 am
by WANGAN_X
still got the goat... this car will be a toy... one more tidit
GT42RL
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:52 am
by complacent
stop teasing.
nobody likes a tease.
(preliminary oontz?)
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:42 am
by Sabre
WANGAN_X wrote:still got the goat... this car will be a toy... one more tidit
GT42RL

That's a biggin...
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:10 am
by WANGAN_X
we will hold the oontzing until i get a complete parts list...
but it is a 06 running a claimed 604awhp and 580lb/ft at 23psi on a built STI block
sound legit?
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:23 am
by complacent
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:28 am
by Mr Kleen
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:59 am
by Libra Monkee
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:19 am
by Sabre
WANGAN_X wrote:we will hold the oontzing until i get a complete parts list...
but it is a 06 running a claimed 604awhp and 580lb/ft at 23psi on a built STI block
sound legit?
With that turbo, quite possible depending on what they did to the block and if they are running WI. My worry with that big of a turbo is lag...
Oh, and as the fella's said:

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:55 am
by WANGAN_X
well he sold the 42, but has a perrin 35r on it now...
the question at hand is, is this capable of the claimed hp he said on the 35 it should be around
I am running a Perrin gt35r rotated mount turbo kit, RPS clutch, greddy turbo timer and boost controller, PE 850cc injectors, hks ssqv bov, turbo xs fmic, blitz nur spec exhaust, tein s-tech springs, greddy remote switch, defi boost and egt gauge, stewart warner 60 psi boost gauge, tein hood dampers, 6.5’ tv

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 12:43 pm
by thermobox
if you think you can trust him and the condition of the car i say go for it. if he's at all sketchy or you can't get the info you need/want then be careful.
my .02
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:21 pm
by avriette
Sabre wrote:My worry with that big of a turbo is lag...
You know, the Supra people do 700-800hp on that turbo. They wait for 5,000 rpm and pull up to 7,500-8,000 rpm. At that point, they squeeze for the additional 200hp to get to 1,000hp. It's kind of insane to realize that they have five-friggin-thousand-rpm of turbo lag, but there are two things to remember:
1) it will blow a busa off the road.
2) even down at 3,000rpm these guys are making 300hp. it's not like they're a
slouch off boost...
With that said, I'm all for huge lag as long as there's north of 600hp to look forward to. Lag is actually one of the things I love most about turbocharged cars. Most of the time, it's docile. Sort of like Schroedinger's cat, right? Out of the box could come a Ford Escort or a Ferrari Enzo. The only difference is, it's determined by my right foot and the gear I choose coming out of a turn, not a Feynman Diagram.
(oh, and bump! I'm reading through my backlog in Google Reader)
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:26 am
by Sabre
WANGAN_X wrote:well he sold the 42, but has a perrin 35r on it now...
the question at hand is, is this capable of the claimed hp he said on the 35 it should be around
WANGAN_X wrote:
06 running a claimed 604awhp and 580lb/ft at 23psi on a built STI block
If you asking if he is getting 604awhp and 580lb/ft at 23psi on a 35R... I'll just say I think he would be the first person to do so. Knock those down about 100hp/100lbs/ft and you're in 35R territory.
Here is a 35R on race gas that is making 540whp and 540lbs/ft while boost was set at 31psi. At 23psi, he'd be a lot lower than that.
avriette wrote:Sabre wrote:My worry with that big of a turbo is lag...
You know, the Supra people do 700-800hp on that turbo. They wait for 5,000 rpm and pull up to 7,500-8,000 rpm. At that point, they squeeze for the additional 200hp to get to 1,000hp. It's kind of insane to realize that they have five-friggin-thousand-rpm of turbo lag, but there are two things to remember:
Ya, but I'm guessing his redline is probably 7500, depending on who built that engine. A 42R wouldn't spool till easily 5000 or 5500rpm. That doesn't give much "fun time"

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:59 am
by WANGAN_X
sorry guys deal fell through, everyone else i talked to said that it didn't seem worth it, and me not really know scoobies and them knowing em i went with their perogative and found out he sold it any way
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:47 am
by complacent

Sorry the deal fell through.
Sorry you got us all worked up...
I keeed, I keeed!
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:38 am
by WANGAN_X
so onto my next project who wants to help me either
A make a WRX MAWD
or
B make a MR2 AWD
any takers?
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:40 am
by Sabre
AWD MR2 = HOT
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:23 am
by avriette
Sabre wrote:AWD MR2 = HOT
and "HEAVY" and "NOT MR"... doesn't making an MR2 AWD totally defeat the purpose of a light, low-displacement, mid-engined, rear-drive car? I mean, would you consider doing that to an NSX or a F430?
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:27 am
by WANGAN_X
avriette wrote:Sabre wrote:AWD MR2 = HOT
and "HEAVY" and "NOT MR"... doesn't making an MR2 AWD totally defeat the purpose of a light, low-displacement, mid-engined, rear-drive car? I mean, would you consider doing that to an NSX or a F430?
you sir/ma'am should be shot out of a canon for saying such blasphemous statements...
you never see'd the Rally MR2's never heard of the RS200... if not i apologize... but they did some serious tearing up of the rally circuits
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:46 am
by Cereb Daithi
WANGAN_X wrote:
you sir/ma'am should be shot out of a canon for saying such blasphemous statements...
you never see'd the Rally MR2's never heard of the RS200... if not i apologize... but they did some serious tearing up of the rally circuits
oh god... RS200... *runs to get beach-towel*
0-60 in just over 2 seconds. god those were amazing cars. AWD MR2 would be hot. well any mid-engined awd is hot really. *sigh* i really would love to have a RS200. RIP group B rally. wish i was old enough to remember it in it's glory days
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:40 am
by complacent
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:02 am
by Sabre
I actually knew a kid at NASA HQ that had one that he was *trying* to get working... I have no idea what happened to it after I left.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:29 am
by Mr Kleen
the RS200 requires a complete engine rebuild after something like 100 hours, maybe less. seriously high strung...
I'm with Avriette on the MR2 AWD conversion, but don't let that stop ya!
