Page 1 of 1

Windows Vista Req released...

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:28 pm
by Sabre
Dear God... I think that I'll stick to my 2.5MB kernel and Enlightenment...
Full site here.

A Windows Vista Capable PC includes at least:

* A modern processor (at least 800MHz1).
* 512 MB of system memory.
* A graphics processor that is DirectX 9 capable.

Windows Vista Premium Ready PCs
To get an even better Windows Vista experience, including the Windows Aero user experience, ask for a Capable PC that is designated Premium Ready, or choose a PC that meets or exceeds the Premium Ready requirements described below. Features available in specific premium editions of Windows Vista, such as the ability to watch and record live TV, may require additional hardware.

A Windows Vista Premium Ready PC includes at least:

* 1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor1.
* 1 GB of system memory.
* A graphics processor that runs Windows Aero2.
* 128 MB of graphics memory.
* 40 GB of hard drive capacity with 15 GB free space.
* DVD-ROM Drive3.
* Audio output capability.
* Internet access capability.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:49 pm
by Cereb Daithi
F that. im OS X all the way.. do you KNOW how much useless stuff will be in vista... just like XP.. i mean have you SEEN some of the hidden files in XP? they have like the equivilant of "deleted scenes and directors comentary"... (i use mainly macs if you havent already guessed).. and the fact that they totally overhual the whole way the UI works... but still have the option of running it like XP increases the time to produce and physical space it takes up on a a drive.....but oh well... all new windows programs will be designed for vista.... sigh... so why not get it.. *grumble*

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:54 pm
by Sabre
Sadly, the reason I use Windows (games) will require me to upgrade to Vista for DX10. Most of the time I boot into FreeBSD.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:01 pm
by chicken n waffles
Cereb Daithi wrote:F that. im OS X all the way.. do you KNOW how much useless stuff will be in vista... just like XP.. i mean have you SEEN some of the hidden files in XP? they have like the equivilant of "deleted scenes and directors comentary"... (i use mainly macs if you havent already guessed).. and the fact that they totally overhual the whole way the UI works... but still have the option of running it like XP increases the time to produce and physical space it takes up on a a drive.....but oh well... all new windows programs will be designed for vista.... sigh... so why not get it.. *grumble*
yawn

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:26 pm
by Sabre
chicken n waffles wrote: yawn
lol, said like the true rommate of Colin!

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:33 pm
by chicken n waffles
i remain on the fence in the windows vs osx debate

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 6:26 pm
by Mr Kleen
I like PC games that came out in the last 7 years, so I'm tied to Windows for the time being.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:38 pm
by Cereb Daithi
lol im on all 3 sides... i use windows for gaming, mac for my music production, and linux for taking up boredom. they're all tools to me