Page 1 of 1

Fanless spinning heatsink: more efficient and immune to dust

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:47 am
by Sabre
Extreme Tech
There’s a fundamental flaw with fan-and-heatsink cooling systems: no matter how hard the fan blows, a boundary layer of motionless, highly-insulating air remains on the heatsink. You can increase the size of the heatsink and you can blow more air, but ultimately the boundary layer prevents the system from being efficient; it’s simply a physical limitation of fan-and-heatsink cooling systems in specific, and every kind of air-cooled heat exchanger in general, including air conditioning and refrigeration units.

But what if you did away with the fan? What if the heatsink itself rotated? Well, believe it or not, rotating the heat exchanger obliterates the boundary layer, removes the need for a fan, and it’s so efficient that it can operate at low and very quiet speeds. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Air Bearing Heat Exchanger [PDF]. Developed by Jeff Koplow, a researcher at the US government’s Sandia National Laboratories, the new heatsink (which has also been dubbed the “Sandia Cooler”) basically resembles a big, metal fan. The cooler consists of a static metal baseplate, which is connected to the CPU, GPU, or other hot object, and a finned, rotating heat exchanger that are cushioned by a thin (0.001-inch) layer of air. As the metal blades spin, centrifugal force kicks up the air and throws it up and outwards, much like an impeller, creating a cooling effect.
Image

Great to see some innovation in something as simple as a heatsink!

Re: Fanless spinning heatsink: more efficient and immune to

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:35 pm
by complacent
looks like it makes sense. i'd love to see some results in the field after a period of time.

Re: Fanless spinning heatsink: more efficient and immune to

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:02 am
by zaxrex
OK, c'mon. I can't be the only one that thinks it is hinky that the article starts out saying boundary air layer is bad, and then goes on to say ow the sink is floated on said air with no contact.

Reading more I see why, but the article is written in such a way that you would immediately question it.

Re: Fanless spinning heatsink: more efficient and immune to

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:17 am
by HappyIdiot
ooooooo ahhhhhhh
zaxrex wrote:OK, c'mon. I can't be the only one that thinks it is hinky that the article starts out saying boundary air layer is bad, and then goes on to say ow the sink is floated on said air with no contact.
After I read the second paragraph Sabre posted, I was already starting to question it. In addition, heat sinks will need to start coming with warning labels. "Do not stick fingers in spinning objects."

I'm glad to see someone is trying to reinvent the wheel though.