Page 1 of 1
FB Engine
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:45 pm
by Sabre
For those that receive Subaru's Drive magazine, you probably saw this.
THE ALL-NEW SUBARU FB ENGINE
I was very disappointed to see that it does not have Direct Injection... This is for the non-turbo version though, so maybe the turbo version will have DI. The change to rocker arms is very interesting, as is the new exhaust routing and the change over to a single overhead CAM. The newer stroke does make it a more "square" engine design.
Code: Select all
2011 FB 2010 EJ
Displacement, cc (cu in) 2,498 (152) 2,457 (150)
Bore/stroke, mm (in) 94.0/90.0 (3.70/3.54) 99.5/79.0 (3.92/3.11)
Peak horsepower, @ rpm 170 @ 5,800 rpm 170 @ 6,000 rpm
Peak torque, lb-ft @ rpm 174 @ 4,100 rpm 170 @ 4,400 rpm
Compression ratio, :1 10.5 10.0
Fuel requirement Unleaded gasoline (87 octane) Unleaded gasoline (87 octane)
Valvetrain configuration 16v, double overhead camshaft 16v, single overhead camshaft
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:49 pm
by PGT
hope it does better than a 10% improvement in fuel economy. Otherwise, this is non-news.
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:57 pm
by Sabre
With DI, it might have... but I don't think this one will
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:35 pm
by complacent
PGT wrote:hope it does better than a 10% improvement in fuel economy. Otherwise, this is non-news.
i'm inclined to think this as well. is the new lump significantly lighter? i noticed that isn't listed in the specs...
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:01 pm
by thermatico
Maybe they're doing the same as the new Ford 5.0 Coyote. It's set-up for DI, but Ford is holding it back for the mid-cycle refresh.
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:27 am
by chicken n waffles
thermatico wrote:Maybe they're doing the same as the new Ford 5.0 Coyote. It's set-up for DI, but Ford is holding it back for the mid-cycle refresh.
that was my guess, but since subaru is so late to the D.I. party, why not start off on the right foot?
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:50 am
by Sabre
Why the hell do that is my question.. ya, it brings something new to the refresh... but it also costs more money to not just implement it in the first place. They would also come out looking very good for having forward thinking engineering... but no, they have to take baby steps
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:29 pm
by PGT
well, the good news is that Hyundai is spanking Honda's ass on fuel economy so it draws some attention away. Still, given AWD, Subaru needs to up their game just to make par, let alone be a class leader (which they'll never be).
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:11 pm
by Mr Kleen
without knowing the long range plan it's difficult to speculate about the new engine. given what we DO know it is a bit of a puzzler.
perhaps this is the first step, the second is DI, the third is hybrid, the fourth is cold fusion and it all makes sense at corporate???
Re: FB Engine
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:23 pm
by Raven
Sabre wrote:I was very disappointed to see that it does not have Direct Injection... This is for the non-turbo version though, so maybe the turbo version will have DI. The change to rocker arms is very interesting, as is the new exhaust routing and the change over to a single overhead CAM. The newer stroke does make it a more "square" engine design.
I believe they're changing to a DOHC design, the current eco model EJ is SOHC. The smaller bore and longer stroke is expected, smaller bores have advantages in combustion efficiency.