Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:51 pm
by avriette
WANGAN_X wrote:
avriette wrote:
Sabre wrote:AWD MR2 = HOT
and "HEAVY" and "NOT MR"... doesn't making an MR2 AWD totally defeat the purpose of a light, low-displacement, mid-engined, rear-drive car? I mean, would you consider doing that to an NSX or a F430?
you sir/ma'am should be shot out of a canon for saying such blasphemous statements...

you never see'd the Rally MR2's never heard of the RS200... if not i apologize... but they did some serious tearing up of the rally circuits
It would help if we could sit and talk at a meet some time. I'll give you my "I don't want a safe, well-sorted out car. I want a car that's going to explode if I look at it funny. I want it to have gobs of lag, be loud as sin, and do half-mile long burnouts at 90mph" speech. :)

And no, I hadn't heard of the RS200, although looking at it now, unf, that's a neat looking car. I love how they mounted the engine/turbo.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:21 pm
by Cereb Daithi
yeah I'm a huge huge huge fan of the RS200. One of the only fords I'd ever jump to buy if I could.

to further it..

RS200 cruising with some MR2s

and..

History lesson in video form