Sun Buys MYSQL for $1 Billion

[WRXWagon2112]

WashingtonPost. com article hmah.

Sun to Buy MySQL for $1 Billion

By JORDAN ROBERTSON
The Associated Press
Wednesday, January 16, 2008; 10:23 AM

SAN FRANCISCO -- Sun Microsystems Inc. plans to buy open-source software maker MySQL AB for $1 billion, beefing up the server maker's database offerings with a company whose technology is used by some of the world's biggest Web sites.

Sun, in a separate announcement before the market opened, said its second quarter revenue would narrowly exceed Wall Street estimates. It also said profit would fall at the high end of analysts' expectations. The company revealed its preliminary results ahead of schedule.

Santa Clara-based Sun is paying $800 million in cash and assuming $200 million in options to acquire MySQL. The Swedish company makes open-source database software used by companies such as online search leader Google Inc., popular Internet hangout Facebook Inc. and Finnish phone maker Nokia Corp.

Sun said the deal will help spread MySQL's software to large corporations, which have been the biggest customers of Sun's servers and software, and boost its distribution through Sun's relationships with other server makers such as IBM Corp. and Dell Inc.

Sun has tied its fortunes to open-source software. It believes it can sell more server computers and ring up higher maintenance fees by also offering software whose source code is publicly available for free.

MySQL competes with non-open-source offerings from Microsoft Corp. and Oracle Corp., which dominate database software for traditional businesses.

However, MySQL is the rapidly growing market leader in open-source database software, particularly among Web-based companies, where it commands about 80 percent of the global market, according to Sun Chief Executive Jonathan Schwartz.

Microsoft is less than 10 percent of that market, Schwartz said.

"We are really acquiring a database that customers and Web companies across the world have moved to at a breathtaking clip," Schwartz said in an interview. "The titans of the Web all use MySQL _ banks, automobile companies, pretty much all of the Fortune 500 runs MySQL in their shops."

The acquisition, expected to close in the third or fourth quarter, takes pressure off Sun to spend some of the cash it's been accumulating. It also bolsters its software offerings with a well-known known name in Internet data retrieval.

"This gives us access to every hot Web company on earth, and every company that will be hot 5 years from now," Schwartz said. "For us, this is completely landscape-changing."

Sun also said it expects net income of between $230 million to $265 million, or 28 cents to 32 cents per share. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial were expecting profit of between 22 cents and 38 cents.

Sun predicts $3.6 billion in sales during the second quarter. Analysts were expecting, on average, $3.58 billion in sales.

The company was expected to release its results January 24.

Despite financial difficulties that have plagued Sun since the dot-com meltdown in 2001, the company has been accumulating a cash horde that reached $5.9 billion at the end of the 2007 fiscal year.

In recent quarters, as Sun has returned to profitability under new management and tightened cost controls, investors have pressured the company to spend some of its war chest in ways that boost its value.

Still, some shareholders remain skeptical about the company's prospects.

Sun's stock price has slid about 25 percent since the company's 1-for-4 reverse stock split in November, an essentially cosmetic maneuver to remove the stigma of slumping shares.

In a reverse stock split, a company lowers the number of outstanding shares, boosting the value of each share, while keeping total market value unchanged.

As a result, Sun's share price jumped from around $5 to more than $20, but has fallen sharply since then, closing Tuesday at $14.98 before the acquisition and results were announced.

Sun shares rose 76 cents, or more than 5 percent, to $15.74 early Wednesday.

--Alan

[complacent]

WOW.

(holy isht!!!)

[WRXWagon2112]

Yeah. Silly Sun, don't they know that isht is free?

But if you think that's a big layout to acquire another company, take a look at this.

Oracle to Buy BEA for $7.85 Billion

The Associated Press
Wednesday, January 16, 2008; 8:36 AM

REDWOOD SHORES, Calif. -- Business software maker Oracle Corp. said Wednesday it agreed to buy BEA Systems Inc. for about $7.85 billion, a compromise price that ends a months-long dispute over the value of the software company.

Oracle agreed to pay $19.375 per share for BEA, which makes "middleware," the computer coding that helps business applications interact more smoothly with databases. The price is based on 405.3 million outstanding BEA shares as of Nov. 30. Oracle put the total price of the deal at $8.5 billion.

The price represents a premium of 24 percent over BEA's closing share price of $15.58 on Tuesday.

The offer for the San Jose company is much richer than one from Oracle it rebuffed in October. That overture was for $17 a share, valuing the company at about $6.7 billion. At the time, BEA's board demanded a price of $21 per share. The directors unanimously approved the latest offer.

Oracle said it expects BEA to add 1 cent to 2 cents per share to adjusted earnings in the first year after the deal closes. That requires stockholder and regulatory approval.

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison has already spent more than $25 billion during the past three years buying a long list of smaller competitors like PeopleSoft, Siebel Systems and Hyperion Solutions.

--Alan

[zaxrex]

Hey, somebody!
Buy my junk...

[Sabre]

I knew about the MySQL one, but the BEA one came as a total shock!

Sun buying MySQL - Not a bad thing if they do it right
Oracle buying BEA - W00t, more bloatware!

[WRXWagon2112]

Oracle's in a race with SAP to dominate the business apps market. I'm not sure I like either of the two companies.

--Alan

[Sabre]

I sure as hell don't. I've had the fortune of working with Oracle DB's and WebLogic... I really can't say anything good about them that I can't find in other products that are cheaper and faster.

[Phibs]

^^^^ +1, Amen, amen.

[Sabre]

To return a post from the dead....
News

Results from the 2010 Eclipse User Survey reveal interesting trends surrounding open source usage and opinions, writes InfoWorld's Savio Rodrigues. Linux usage among developers is on the rise, at the expense of Windows, and MySQL has pulled ahead of Oracle, by a factor of 3-to-2, as the database of choice among Eclipse developers. 'The data demonstrate that fears surrounding Oracle's control over MySQL have not resulted in lower use of MySQL in favor of an alternative open source database,' Rodrigues writes.

[complacent]

Yea... This one's from the cellar for sure. Phibbs as the last poster? Wow.

I'm honestly concerned about how Oracle is going to deal with MySQL doing so well.

I guess if they shit-can the product, we could always start calling them "testicle" instead of "oracle."

[schvin]

yeah, will be interesting to watch.

i'm more concerned about solaris/opensol myself, but, will be very interesting...

[Raven]

I don't get it, why would anyone buy MySQL? It's a rudimentary DB on its best days.

[Sabre]

I don't get it, why would anyone buy MySQL? It's a rudimentary DB on its best days.

Maybe because it runs more things on the Internet than Oracle? Hell, the LAMP stack runs ~55% of all Internet sites... Maybe it was PEBKAC?

[Raven]

Well it is very good for simple content delivery. I wonder what they will do with it.

[Sabre]

Well it is very good for simple content delivery. I wonder what they will do with it.

Sadly, probably squish it...

[complacent]

Sadly, probably squish it...

This. I don't even want to think about all the various projects that are completely dependent upon MySQL.

[ElZorro]

Well it is very good for simple content delivery. I wonder what they will do with it.

It runs the second busiest website on the internet just fine...

[Raven]

It runs the second busiest website on the internet just fine...

Sure, hence "simple content delivery." But you sure as hell aren't gonna run SAP on a MySQL DB, not a chance in hell.

[Cereb Daithi]

They bought it for how much?