the only honda civic i would ever want
Moderator: Moderators
- WANGAN_X
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
- Sabre
- DCAWD Founding Member
- Posts: 21432
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Springfield, VA
- Contact:
OMG, that thing is ridiculous....
Sabre (Julian)

92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.

92.5% Stock 04 STI
Good choice putting $4,000 rims on your 1990 Honda Civic. That's like Betty White going out and getting her tits done.
- complacent
- DCAWD Founding Member
- Posts: 11651
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: near the rockies. very.
- Contact:
-
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:48 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
- Contact:
I doubt it. Or, maybe it will be fast for one run. If it's mounted up front like that, and as low as it is, it has to be on the strut towers or (eek) directly to the body. There's just nowhere to put an engine that heavy an that torquey in that car.complacent wrote:holy wow. It almost feels wrong, doesn't it?
(I bet it's fast as snot though)
Years and years ago, T&HTP published an article about an old hatchback civic that had a 3.0L from an Acura Legend mounted in the hatch area. Essentially making it a mid-engine, transverse-mount, rear-wheel-drive car (uh, like a MR2, I guess; not like a Lambo).
Also, it looks like the car has been back-halved, so it's got enormous tires out back and probably a live axle. So the engine has no room to give in the driveline or mounts (wtf kind of tranny did they stick in there? the car isn't long enough for a TH400!!), and all that torque is going to rip the fucker in half on the first pull.
I'd really like to see video of it moving. But I'm not sure "fast" is the right description. Maybe "dangerous" or "autobifurcating."
rocket scientist
-
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:48 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
- Contact:
I doubt it. Or, maybe it will be fast for one run. If it's mounted up front like that, and as low as it is, it has to be on the strut towers or (eek) directly to the body. There's just nowhere to put an engine that heavy an that torquey in that car.complacent wrote:holy wow. It almost feels wrong, doesn't it?
(I bet it's fast as snot though)
Years and years ago, T&HTP published an article about an old hatchback civic that had a 3.0L from an Acura Legend mounted in the hatch area. Essentially making it a mid-engine, transverse-mount, rear-wheel-drive car (uh, like a MR2, I guess; not like a Lambo).
Also, it looks like the car has been back-halved, so it's got enormous tires out back and probably a live axle. So the engine has no room to give in the driveline or mounts (wtf kind of tranny did they stick in there? the car isn't long enough for a TH400!!), and all that torque is going to rip the fucker in half on the first pull.
I'd really like to see video of it moving. But I'm not sure "fast" is the right description. Maybe "dangerous" or "autobifurcating."
rocket scientist
-
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:48 pm
- Location: Arlington, VA
- Contact:
- Cereb Daithi
- DCAWD Groupie
- Posts: 3747
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:07 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact: